Nuclear medicine coding requires careful attention to the specific procedure performed, documentation, imaging protocol, and applicable CPT coding requirements. Radiology teams frequently encounter questions involving studies such as V/Q scans, HIDA scans, renal imaging, and other nuclear medicine procedures. Current coding resources emphasize the importance of matching the documented procedure to the appropriate CPT code rather than relying solely on the name of the examination. For example, searches for the VQ scan CPT code and CPT code for VQ scan commonly arise when coding ventilation-perfusion imaging. Similarly, a HIDA scan CPT code may depend on the documented imaging protocol and whether additional components such as pharmacologic intervention are performed. For current-year coding, coders should always validate code descriptions against the applicable CPT manual and payer guidance rather than relying on outdated references. Another common question is whether CPT 78306 is a PET scan. Nuclear medicine coding requires distinguishing between different imaging modalities and procedure families, since the clinical purpose and technical components of a study influence code selection. Some coding scenarios can be particularly detailed. For instance, using the CPT manual, select the code for the following procedure. Kidney imaging morphology with vascular flow requires review of the actual documented service and the applicable code descriptor. This illustrates why procedure terminology alone may not provide enough information for accurate coding. Modern radiology organizations are increasingly evaluating technology to support these complex workflows. RadioNEX AI for radiology coding can assist with reviewing radiology documentation and identifying coding-relevant procedure and diagnosis information. Such technology can be particularly useful in high-volume environments where multiple imaging modalities are processed daily. Ultimately, accurate nuclear medicine CPT codes depend on complete documentation, current coding references, and appropriate professional validation. Technology can support the process, but final coding decisions should remain aligned with current coding guidelines, payer requirements, and the documented service.